Cornell Insider

a blog by the writers of the Cornell Review

Monday Reading Madness #35

Posted by dennisshiraev on February 7, 2010

- Months later, Maine highlights the underutilization of our emergency alert system.

Lego competition in Duffield.

- The Ivy League is apparently immune to such problems, but here’s an analysis of what happens when you have a 60-40 ratio on campus.

- Another big weekend for men’s basketball, while hockey goes 1-1.

- Two Cornell professors discuss gender equality in engineering.

- This was from last week, but in case you didn’t hear, tuition is going up. (Via METAezra).

- How did I miss this?

- New Pew research says blogging is down among young adults.

- Our friends at the Stanford Review blog cover an interesting on-campus debate about Christianity and capitalism.

- Another reminder that Cornell’s fraternity mishaps pale in comparison to the stuff that unfortunately goes on at other schools.

- It’s an old story now, but kudos to Pi Phi for getting their fashion guide picked up by… Fox News!

- Some sort of spiderman device, brought to you by Cornell researchers.

- Stephen Hayes argues that the White House is politicizing intelligence.

- We might have two more sets of confirmation hearings on our hands in the near future.

- Finally, I can’t help but pass along this fascinating bit of experimental research. Hat tip to JP.

Posted in Campus Insiders, National News | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Cornell Donations Up

Posted by dennisshiraev on February 3, 2010

According to this article from BusinessWeek, Cornell posted the biggest percentage fundraising gains of the twenty schools that raised the most money last year. While total donations to U.S. colleges fell 12%, Cornell recorded a 9.1% increase in donations ($446.8 million total). Other top schools mentioned in the article experienced large drops in annual giving: Harvard (-7.5%), Stanford (-19%), Yale (-26%), UCLA (-23%), Duke (-22%).

One could raise the objection that Cornell’s numbers are inflated by the $170 million gift to Cornell from Sanford Weill, which was included in the overall calculations, but I don’t think this should be any reason to add an asterisk to our stats. I don’t have access to the data, but it’s obvious that lots of other schools received large donations from individual donors. Ours just happened to be the biggest this time around.

Posted in Campus Insiders | Tagged: | 1 Comment »

Cornell Law Professor Speaks to CRs

Posted by prb56 on February 2, 2010

The Cornell Republicans received a rare treat Monday evening: a conservative law professor! And one from Harvard at that! Yes, you read that correctly. Professor William Jacobson from the Cornell Law School spoke for the group of young racist tea-baggers and covered the gamut of topics from how he became a conservative (more on this) to life as a conservative law professor in general to his career outside of academia. When addressing how he became a conservative, he expressed his disdain for the concept as it assumes that one was a prior liberal. It is based on the idea that one is a liberal by default in our society and that conservatism requires a transformation process. He explained that this is not really the case by offering a quick anecdote of how young children do not like to have their toys stolen or used without permission. This, the professor explained, shows that we start out conservative, but end up becoming liberal by the institutional forces of society (public school, university, media, and just about everything outside of Fox News and talk radio). He hit upon three points when explaining his conservatizing process.

The most important one was that when he was at Hamilton College, he had travelled to the Soviet Union with his Russian language professor on the last plane out of the United States when Soviet diplomats were leaving for good. He witnessed the diplomats bringing back with them televisions, radios, and a myriad of items that could not be found in the USSR. Also, while in the Soviet Union, he befriended a family that had an ancestor who was murdered by Stalin for purportedly being a traitor. He was cleared from the annals of the Evil Empire and his family had to continue existence under a new name. When returning, Professor Jacobson embarked upon a research project of the Soviet economic system. It was here that he not only learned the obvious practical limitations of central planning, but also the political oppression that tended to accompany it. As one could guess, this discovery was a large conservative influence.

The professor pointed to less grave issues such as living through the Carter years and having to start paying taxes as other reasons why he eventually became a Reaganite by the 1984 election (though he was unable to vote due a registration snafu). Oddly enough, the Prof had supported John Anderson in the 1980 race, and even George McGovern in 1972! You might say he came a long way in twelve years.

2008 was the first election in which Professor Jacobson became actively involved in the political process, mainly due his witnessing of Jimmy Carter II garnering cult-like support. The question was posed at the end whether or not the professor would have been hired in 2007 at Cornell if he were politically active at that point. He says he does not know, and claims that Cornell Law School is actually somewhat tolerant of dissent. However, I think I know, and you probably do too.

Regardless he is here now, and we should simply be thankful for that. If anyone is interested, he maintains a personal blog regarding current events here. He started in 2008 during the campaign. Needless to say, it does not win him friends in the legal community.

Professor Jacobson also works outside of academia in the realm of investment law, where he works to recoup damages for defrauded investors.

Posted in Miscellaneous | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Top 25.

Posted by dennisshiraev on February 1, 2010

Great work men’s basketball. From the ESPN/USA Today Poll:

Posted in Campus Insiders | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Obama Pushed to Repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”

Posted by luciarafanelli on February 1, 2010

According to a New York Times article (found here), the Obama administration faces a dilemma regarding how to deal with the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy (DADT). The law, which was passed in 1993, requires that gays in the military not be open about their sexuality. Obama has long been opposed to this policy, but has yet to attempt to induce Congress to take substantive action against it. In 2009, he said, he did not want to divert national attention from his healthcare initiative by addressing another highly controversial issue. However, Obama claimed to make the repeal of DADT a priority in the new year. But with 2010 well underway, the fate of Obamacare unknown, and the country still involved in multiple wars, the president appears to be hesitating.

Such hesitation is reminiscent of one of Obama’s appearances in a pre-election presidential debate, during which he was asked about his opinion on gay marriage. Although he tried to associate himself with a pro-gay rights position, he refused to offer a clear, decisive answer. An analogous happening seems to be occurring now in the policymaking arena: Although in principle Obama is rigidly opposed to DADT and although a September military journal article called it a failure, the already long delay on the repeal coupled with military pressure to postpone it until the country’s armed forces are in a more stable position cast a shadow of doubt over Obama’s campaign promise to end DADT. Even so, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates maintains that it is only a matter of time before the policy is nullified.

Undoubtedly, Obama’s ultimate treatment of DADT will significantly affect his relationship to his gay rights activist base, who are hopeful for Tuesday’s Congressional hearing on the issue, during which plans for a repeal will supposedly be released, but who were angered by the president’s seeming initial reluctance to deliver on his campaign-time gay rights rhetoric. Whatever the result of Tuesday’s hearing, it appears, it will have a great impact on how Obama is viewed by a key demographic of his constituency.

Posted in National News | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Monday Reading Madness # 34

Posted by dennisshiraev on January 31, 2010

- The biggest story of the week was the selection of Nancy Pelosi as our convocation speaker. Of course, we at the Cornell Review had our own take on the matter.

- It was a great weekend for Cornell sports: the hockey team picked up two important wins to jump atop the ECAC standings, while the basketball team continued its Ivy League dominance with a 86-50 win over Harvard.

- The summer reading project (Philip K. Dick’s novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?) for this year’s incoming freshmen (2014’s) seems more engaging than the last two selections, but I can think of a dozen science fiction novels that I would have rather recommended.

- Here is the Sun’s article on Mark von Bucher ‘12.

- This has been a truly sad academic year for the Cornell student body.

- Writing seminar co-founder Jonathan Bishop has also passed away.

- Some more commentary on the Cornell Greeks.

- Keep in mind that there are worse incidents of hazing during fraternity rushing and pledging.

- METAezra has some insights on the university endowment figures.

- Bilmes takes a stab at explaining the Cornell law school applications surge. His points make sense, but I’d still like to see the admissions statistics for comparably ranked law schools like UVA, Georgetown, Northwestern, and Duke before I’m completely satisfied.

- Read Krauthammer’s critique of the administration’s insistence of “treating Islamist terrorism as a law-enforcement issue.”

- The horrible decision to hold the KSM trial in NYC is at least being partially reconsidered.

Posted in Campus Insiders, National News | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Crippled Dems Get Their Break

Posted by Oliver Renick on January 30, 2010

By now you’ve probably heard of ‘ACORN pimp’ James O’Keefe III and three other men being arrested after allegedly tampering with phones and communication devices in the office of New Orleans Senator Mary Landrieu.  By now you’ve probably heard Olbermann’s Meltdown and Matthews’s thigh-tingling while basking in their moment of brainwashed ecstasy.  By now you should have read O’Keefe’s released statement on Breitbart’s Big Journalism.  Point is, pretty much everything to be said has been said on this matter.  Unfortunately, albeit typically, the mainstream media have blown it gigantically out of proportion and are desperately attempting to make it into a new Watergate.  As the left watches the administration bumble about and the seats of the Senate fill with Republicans, they’re grabbing onto whatever they can like a spider being flushed down a toilet.

But what I may be more qualified to speak on are the attacks on the ‘underworld conservative ring’ that has been under assault by  MSNBC, CNN, and all the rest of the usual suspects.  The commentators on these networks have become so politicized and aggressive that they fail to recognize success in their own supposed industry: journalism.  The rich irony here is that the figureheads on these networks are launching full-force attacks on organizations such as the CN for funding campus newspapers in general- the very same line of work (i.e, JOURNALISM)  that funds them.  I am not exactly a party-toeing Republican, and I have spoken many times on the pitfalls of highly abrasive and obstructive journalism.  But I can say that I’ve had the opportunity to know Mr. O’Keefe personally and that the caricature being painted of him by the left, of course, is completely off-base.

The immensely successful investigative reporting he has done in the past should serve as inspiration to young writers equally on both sides of the political spectrum; we can never know who may need to be exposed next.  If Olbermann and Matthews had a shred of intelligence, they wouldn’t try to shut down practices that are also beneficial to those on ‘their side.’  Of course, their rage prevents them from seeing clearly.  But you already know this.

Posted in National News | Tagged: , | 2 Comments »

And Another One Slips Past ‘Stun’ Editors

Posted by Oliver Renick on January 28, 2010

I’m in an awkward situation here.  I’m often shocked when I read the Daily Stun, but I’m not sure why I keep writing about the absurdities that often grace the pages of our school’s flagship paper.  At this point, they have become so commonplace that I shouldn’t be shocked.  Yet I am.  I know a few editors at the Stun and they seem to be reasonable people.  So the only answer I have is that they just simply don’t do any editing anymore.  And to complicate things even more, the article I’m calling your attention to today was written by one of the few conservatives at our Blue School, and probably the only one at the Stun (other than when the Bellin Tolls and the WackAttack!).  But that’s what happens when you take an apologetic tone and say high GPA’s (2.25s, precisely) are classist and discriminatory.  I hate to create a riff among conservative Cornellians, but here goes – enough disclaimers.

The article by Leigha Kemmett on fraternities creating a GPA requirement is quite ridiculous – I literally cannot find any logical path from which she drew her conclusions.  To use her own words: it’s a “frankly, stupid” argument.  She takes quite a malicious tone and manages to transform a thoughtful, smart decision by the IFC into a conspiratorial one – as if the frats are all gathering in a dark basement, conniving and hatching a plan to keep dumb people out of their special clubs.  Kemmett believes that by frats enacting a minimum GPA requirement of 2.25 for their pledges, they are “exclusionary…elitist…[exhibiting] classism…blackballing rushees,” and ultimately not living up to their responsibility of “provid[ing] an atmosphere where young minds can blossom and expand.”

How soon we venture from reality.  Let’s set the record straight here, cause obviously nobody else wants to.  Men at Cornell do not join a fraternity to enrich their academic atmosphere and allow their mind to blossom.  They join a frat to make good friends, enrich their social atmosphere, meet sorority babes, and allow their minds to shrivel in Keystone Light.  Not that there’s anything wrong with that – many Cornellians feel this is the ultimate college experience.  And sure, I have many friends in frats who I know have helped other brothers frequently with schoolwork and aided other frat members in their academic difficulties – this happens all the time.  But anyone who has ever gone through pledging will tell you it’s not a place for <2.25ers.  Most programs at Cornell will enforce serious repercussions if one is to fall below a 2.0 GPA.  I for one know that retaining student status in over half of the engineering majors requires a GPA >2.2, and none accept a GPA below 2.0, which I believe is the case for most programs at Cornell.

Yet instead of requiring neophyte Cornellians (most pledges join in their first 3 semesters) to demonstrate some stability in their academics, Kemmett would advocate a system that allows new, inexperienced Cornellians to toe the thin line between success and crushing defeat – how exciting! What is most vexing is that Kemmett goes on in the rest of her article to highlight all the arguments one would make against her stance.  Namely, the fact that if you are doing poorly at Cornell, you should seek help from TAs, PROFESSORS, OFFICE HOURS, TUTORS, HELP SESSIONS, REVIEW SESSIONS, CLASSMATES – not from foam parties, binge-drinking, and all-night mixers.  Do not take me wrong – I know many, many brilliant fraternity members.  But when you’re borderline failing your classes, pledging is not the solution.  I can’t believe I have to be the one to point this out.

Either the author is truly confused on this whole subject, or she has some sort of inner turmoil / resentment towards the fraternity system.  Unfortunately, much of her article is quite bitter and self-absorbed, making me lean towards the latter option.  Not only do I disagree with her on every point, but I highly support this fantastic and responsible decision by the IFC.  I’ll let you decide on some of her quotes (my thoughts in bold).

Either the IFC needs to cut the shit about frats being good for students academically, or they need to rescind this rule, to avoid continuing to govern in hypocrisy. [more great quotes like this after the jump]. Why the animosity? Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Campus Insiders | Tagged: , , | 4 Comments »

Cornell is the “Weirdest Ivy”!?

Posted by dennisshiraev on January 27, 2010

The Cornell Review: the weirdest part about Cornell?

Is Cornell the weirdest of the eight Ivies? So says Chiara Atik. According to this article that she wrote for Guest of a Guest, Cornell is known for its “chess loving, duck researching geeks,” has a Greek system known for “un-mainstream behavior” like copulating with goats, and boasts Bill Nye as one of its most famous alumni.

Okay, so the article is clearly misinformed and completely mischaracterizes the student body as a bunch of eccentric insect enthusiasts and sex-emailing mongers, but we can’t put the blame on Chiara.  After all, she never really visited the other Ivies and most of the stuff she says about Cornell is true, even if it’s over exaggerated, right? Well, not exactly. If she had spent even 5 minutes searching through the popular IvyGate blog she would have found that our Ivy counterparts are guilty of much more deplorable and weird activities:

Brown: In 2008, a varsity hockey player pleaded guilty to voyeurism.

Columbia: Professors get into bar brawls with students whose opinions differ from theirs.

Dartmouth: Students enjoy running naked to attract, (or dissuade?) prospective students.

Harvard: They have their own email debacles.

Penn: Just weird.

Princeton: The Tigers have their own sorority embarrassments.

Yale: This is a family friendly blog, so I recommend all families with small children to stay away from Yale Facebook threads.

And this is just a brief rundown of strange happenings at the other seven Ivies- we haven’t even gotten into campus traditions.

I will say that as much as I dislike Ms. Atik’s characterization of our wonderful school, I do appreciate her Cornell Review, er, shout out?

The Cornell Review is a conservative newspaper founded by Ann Coulter, perhaps the only college publication in the nation which accuses its school of left-wing politics and political correctness.

Wait, what? Say that again. The only publication in the nation that accuses its school of political correctness? This seems to be one of those propositions which is self-evidently false, given the number of newspapers and the number of universities out there. Oh yeah, and furthermore, there’s an entire network of conservative papers that constantly criticize their respective schools for liberal politics. Not really sure where you were going with that one, Ms. Atik. I guess dramatic writing is not really the same thing as insightful, accurate, or interesting writing.

Posted in Campus Insiders | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

“He started it!!”

Posted by Hannah MacLean on January 27, 2010

Yes, we’ve all heard it: Obama’s finger-pointing at the “previous administration”. I don’t even want to venture a guess as to how many times the president will mention how hard it is to fix an 8-year-old mess in a year, how many times he’ll blame George W. Bush, how many times he’ll complain that Republicans aren’t cooperating (gasp!!). He knows that the middle class is angry with (or at least disappointed in) him; Massachusetts made that clear enough (and let’s not forget New Jersey, whose election of a Republican governor was also quite a surprise) – the best he can do is take responsibility for mistakenly believing that his election was a mandate from the public that they wanted him to spend their money, steal from the rich, car companies, nationalize banks and health care (thankfully he hasn’t thus far been able to do all he wants with the final two). He was wrong, and people are finally catching on.

He will not admit he was wrong. There’s a good chance he will find some way to blame Republicans for his mistakes. Before he does so tonight at 9pm, let’s look at the facts from the last year.

7,949.09—Dow Jones Industrial Average close on Jan. 20, 2009.
10,198.68—Dow Jones Industrial Average close on Jan. 27, 2010. (Not so bad!)

$787 billion—Cost of economic stimulus approved by Congress. (To create jobs and boost the economy.)

13 million—Number of people 16 and older unemployed as of January 2009.
14.7 million—Number of people 16 and older unemployed as of December 2009. (Where’d the stimulus money go?)

7.7 percent—Unemployment rate January 2009
10.0 percent—Unemployment rate December 2009 (Ahem… I repeat, where’d the money go?)

$10.6 trillion—Outstanding public debt Jan. 20, 2009.
$12.3 trillion—Outstanding public debt Jan. 14, 2010. (2.3 trillion dollars spent in less than a year… I’d be impressed if I were less worried about where the money’s going.)

$296.4 billion—Federal spending from the financial crisis bailout fund before Jan. 20, 2009. (Even I must admit, perhaps this was not the best idea.)
$173 billion—Federal spending from the financial crisis bailout fund after Jan. 20, 2009. (If throwing money didn’t work the first time, why, may I ask, do we continue to do it??)

$165 billion—Amount of bailout funds repaid by banks and automakers. (Good! Now where’s that money going?)

139—Bank failures between Jan. 20, 2009, and Jan. 14, 2010.

12—Formal news conferences.

21—Foreign countries visited.

29—States visited.

10—Visits to Camp David.

2—Vacations.

*The original article (minus most of the commentary) with most of these numbers is here.

When exactly is the president going to take responsibility for his own mistakes? How nice it would be if tonight’s the night he does it – but don’t get your hopes up.

Posted in National News | 3 Comments »