Cornell Insider

a blog by the writers of the Cornell Review

Author Archive

Cheating and Income

Posted by Peter Bouris on August 18, 2010

This study by researchers at Cornell showed that men who earn less than their wives (presumably female) tend have a higher cheating rate, mainly due to feelings of inadequacy about not having the ability to fulfill the traditional ‘provider’ role for men.  On the other hand, women who earn less than their husbands are less likely to cheat  because they go through a logical thought process which tells them that it is not worth the consequences.  If only men were that smart.

Of course, as it turns out, in any case where either spouse earns significantly more than the other, cheating is more likely for the big money spouse.  Apparently, this is because high incomes provide the resources needed to cover up affairs.  I would add that the ego of many high-income individuals likely contributes to this phenomenon as well.

Posted in Campus Insiders, National News | Tagged: , , | 1 Comment »

NEA Reading List

Posted by Peter Bouris on August 17, 2010

The National Education Association has developed its recommended reading list for the upcoming year.  A pdf of it can be found here.

If you get the chance to review it, notice that many of the listed books involve President Obama.  It is no secret that K-12 teachers on aggregate are almost as liberal as university professors, but do they really need to be this overt about their biases?

There is nothing wrong with teaching school children respect for the current president and the office in general.  Maybe 1 or 2 books about the person would be appropriate.  But do they really have to recommend seven books about a single sitting president for one year?  Let the guy form a legacy without doing it for him!  Also, do you think they could spare to suggest some readings about other great presidents outside of Abraham Lincoln (I suppose they already see Obama as a great president)?  They could easily substitute some of the books about POTUS with something about George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, Theodore Roosevelt, or even Franklin Roosevelt!  But I guess all those guys were either bigoted slave owners, or simply not progressive enough (read Howard Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States to get this point).  The reading list is almost as blatant an act by public education as this:

Posted in National News | Tagged: , , | 2 Comments »

Princeton Review “Best” Lists

Posted by Peter Bouris on August 7, 2010

The Princeton Review annually comes out with best colleges lists for multiple categories.  This year, Cornell was ranked 5th in quality of campus food.  It was also listed as having the 16th best career services and 19th best school newspaper (talk about setting the bar low).

Cross-town cousin Ithaca College was listed as having the most reefer friendly environment.  It was also noted for having the 5th best college radio station and 8th best college theater.

Who knows how the Princeton Review develops these rankings.   Either way, I do not understand how any of these lists are relevant.  All anyone cares about is this ranking.

Posted in Campus Insiders, National News | Tagged: , | 1 Comment »

Notre Dame is Number 1 Executive Producer in Finance

Posted by Peter Bouris on August 6, 2010

Apparently Notre Dame leads all schools in producing executives at ‘top’ financial firms.  Cornell, Harvard, Colgate, and Penn all tied at second.  Notre Dame’s undergraduate Mendoza (this name is associated with mediocrity in baseball) School of Business is the top undergrad business program in the country, according to BusinessWeek.

Of course, the term ‘top’ financial firm is somewhat loaded.  One of the Notre Dame CEOs referenced was the chief at PNC Financial Services Group.  While this is certainly respectable, I am not sure one can consider any financial firm without a location in Manhattan/Jersey City as a ‘top’ financial firm.  Another firm mentioned was Erie Indemnity, a company that I have never heard of despite living minutes from the shore of Lake Erie (Erie Indemnity is located in Erie, PA, about an hour from my house).  In other words, this entire story seems to be an attempt to marginalize the superiority of Ivy League schools (how condescending am I?).  Saying that the best schools do not produce as many leaders in the world’s most competitive industry serves to diminish their luster.

But I am interested to see the number of ‘top’ financial CEOs relative to student body size.  My guess is that the Notre Dame leprechaun would not look quite as tough.

Posted in Cornell in Photos, National News | Tagged: , | 1 Comment »

Fence Vote!

Posted by Peter Bouris on August 6, 2010

Wednesday evening, the Ithaca Common Council voted unanimously to keep the fences up, formalizing a plan that was already known.

Usually these posts involve some commentary, but what do you want from me?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

‘Strongest’ Evidence for Constitutionality of Same-Sex Marriage

Posted by Peter Bouris on August 5, 2010

Cynthia Grant Bowman, a professor at Cornell Law School, was recently quoted by Newswise as stating that the decision in Perry v. Schwarzenegger (the Prop 8 case) gives the strongest legal and factual support of any case claiming that a state ban of same-sex marriage violates the federal constitution.  She said that it “…reaches its conclusion that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional under the U.S. Constitution based upon an extremely strong record of evidence laid down at a thoroughly litigated trial.”

I am currently in the process of wading through the decision myself (it is a 138 page pdf online).  So far, I have seen arguments which basically state that Prop 8′s definition of marriage is out of date and that the initiative was pushed for with gay stereotypes.  The decision also discusses the history of California state law.  Additionally, it cited the precedents of Turner v. Safely, 482 US 78, 95 (1987), which states that “the decision to marry is a fundamental right,” and Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur, 414 US 632, 639-40 (1974), which states that “…freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”  Of course, none of this involves the actual definition of marriage.

My main concern with the decision is the application of the 14th Amendment to the legal definition of marriage.  The well known part of the amendment reads:

“No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

Any privileges and immunities of the citizens of the United States are privileges and immunities brought about by federal law.  This basically means that any federal law that is within the federal government’s legitimate powers must be applied equally to citizens in all states, regardless of what the states want (this is the point of the equal protection clause). However, the federal government has no legitimate authority through the Constitution to have any say in the definition of marriage; therefore, the issue is delegated to the states via the 10th amendment.  Note that this also implies states can opt out of the Defense of Marriage Act, which they have done in some cases (Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont, Iowa, and Connecticut all allow same-sex marriage, according to Wikipedia).   So even if the right to marry is protected under the 14th Amendment (this is dubious, regardless of the precedents), the 14th amendment does not allow the federal government to define marriage.

Additionally, I do not see how Prop 8 violates the due process clause, as was stated in Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur.  Prop 8 certainly does not deprive gays of their life or property.  One could argue it deprives them of liberty, but it really does not.  Prop 8 does not permit the State of California to prevent gays from having affection for one another.  It merely distinguishes legal recognition between same-sex couples and dual-sex couples.

This is really the crux of the issue with Judge Walker’s ruling.  The federal courts have no business hearing anything on this matter.   Of course, the case may create a precedent, but that does not mean that the federal government’s involvement is constitutionally sound.  I can hear my high school government teacher screaming ‘Marbury v. Madison’ at me.  However, even the decision to allow for judicial review does not allow the federal courts to create constitutional rules.

If this case goes to SCOTUS, I hope Chief Justice Roberts will have the decency to turn it back to the lower courts.  However, he may feel his hands are tied if the lower courts uphold this ruling.

I welcome folks with greater legal background to comment on this.  Read the already posted comments for more background on exactly what I was saying throughout this.

Posted in Campus Insiders, National News | Tagged: , , , | 3 Comments »

Ivy League Mac vs PC

Posted by Peter Bouris on July 31, 2010

There is not a whole lot of new Cornell news right now, so I figured I’d point the readers in the direction of some fun.

Below is a Mac vs PC commercial spoof.  It features Harvard, Brown, and of course, Cornell.  There are several of these on Youtube that do a fine job of striking at the stereotypes of the featured schools.  For this particular video, note what Brown said to Cornell at the end: “Who let you in?”

I’m sure students at the other Ivies often wonder themselves who exactly let Cornell into the unofficial, yet irrationally prestigious Ivy League.  However, this video does not answer the question of who let Brown into the Ivy League, something that students at Cornell often ask today.

Posted in Campus Insiders, National News | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Adults Worse at Remembering Negative Events

Posted by Peter Bouris on July 24, 2010

A study done at Cornell that was published in the Journal of Experimental Child Psychology suggests that adults have fewer false memories of stressful events than do children.  This finding is contradictory to the hitherto conventional wisdom expressed by legal experts.  The finding has large ramifications for the criminal justice system, as testimonies from adults and children are often evaluated differently.  Until now, most thought that adults have better memories of traumatizing events.  Therefore, adult testimonies were taken more seriously, and were considered to be the final word if they contained information opposite to that of a child’s testimony.  However, the tables may now have turned completely the other way.

Of course, children are not good at remembering negative events either; they are just better than adults, according to the study.  So, the more valuable finding of this study is likely that testimonies in general are unreliable.  Despite this, they are the key source of evidence in any criminal case.

Posted in Campus Insiders | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

The Inconveniences of Not Owning Your Own Plane

Posted by Peter Bouris on July 15, 2010

On this slow day for Cornell news, I will explain my recent interaction with Delta Airlines, and advise all those who have to fly into Ithaca in August to avoid this aero-conglomerate.

This past weekend, I visited a classified fellow in a classified location (I wouldn’t want Delta to go after him too after reading this).  I chose to fly Delta Airlines because it offered the cheapest option by a significant margin; I later learned why.  I flew from my hometown of Buffalo to Detroit, and then to my final destination.  On the way home, I once again had to catch a connecting flight in Detroit.  I left Friday night and was supposed to return Sunday night.  My weekend went something like this:

  1. My flight out of Buffalo was delayed by 30 minutes.  This was problematic as my original schedule only allotted a 30 minute layover in Detroit.
  2. I touched down in Detroit 20 minutes before my final flight was supposed to leave (the pilot made up for lost time).  I stepped off the plane with 10 minutes to go before the flight to my final location was set to depart.
  3. The gate at which we deplaned was on the opposite side of the airport as the gate of my second flight.  The Detroit airport has over 200 gates, which is difficult to navigate for a bumpkin like me (the Buffalo airport has 26 gates, 4 of which are not in operation).
  4. Only knowing that my second flight was in the ‘A’ pavilion while I was in ‘C,’ I sprinted faster and with more tenacity than I have since the summer before my last year playing hockey.
  5. At one point in the Detroit airport, I had to go down an escalator, through a tunnel with neon lights and techno music, and then back up another escalator.  I still wonder why that path could not be straight.
  6. Frantically searching for a big board, I finally found one at the intersection of the ‘A’ and ‘B’ pavilions.  When checking my flight, its status read “Closed.”
  7. Despite my stomach dropping, I still went to the gate with hopes that I could beg my way on board.
  8. To my delight, one of the flight officials was standing in the main corridor and asking for anyone on my flight.
  9. I quickly approached her and handed over my boarding pass.
  10. Within 30 seconds of me sitting down on the plane, the cabin door closed.
  11. Finally at ease, I almost passed out from a lack of oxygen and sheer exhaustion.
  12. I arrived safely at my final destination.  All was well.
  13. All quickly turned sour when my bag did not appear on the carousel at baggage claim.  My bag was still in Detroit (not surprising considering how close the flight from Buffalo was to that out of Detroit).
  14. The next day, I wore the same disgusting clothes I had on during the flight.  I received my bag later that day.
  15. The visit went well.
  16. On the way home, the flight from my visiting point seemed to be right on time to Detroit.
  17. After 15 minutes on the runway, the pilot pulled back into the gate we left and told everyone to get off.  The plane had engine problems.
  18. The flight to Detroit was rescheduled for an hour later.  When the time arrived, it was cancelled.
  19. The airline directed the passengers to a ‘self-help’ terminal where there were no representatives from the airline.  It was assumed that the cattle would eventually figure out what to do with the tools there.
  20. After learning how to use the phones at the ‘self-help’ terminal (more like the ‘gouge-your-eyes out’ terminal), I was finally able to rebook a flight–for the next day.  There were no other flights that day to Detroit or Buffalo.  I now had to miss work since the next day was Monday.
  21. The operator at the airline call center asked if I needed a hotel, to which I naturally responded ‘yes.’  She directed me to hotels.com, with whom I booked a room for almost $100 at a Red Roof Inn.
  22. After hanging up, I then heard a gate attendant tell the passengers who were stranded overnight that they were eligible for a hotel room voucher (amazing how the operator never told me about that).
  23. After learning about the voucher, I tried to cancel my reservation at the Red Roof Inn.  I called the actual Red Roof Inn, and was told that they could do nothing because I booked the room through a third party (as though I had a choice).  The director at the Red Roof Inn gave me the phone number to the third party.
  24. I called the number of the third party.  My initial call was met with “all operators are busy at this time.”  Fair enough.  I then called again a few minutes later.  And then again, and again, and again, and again, and again, etc. for 20 minutes straight of hanging up and redialing.  I was met with the same “all operators are busy at this time,” EVERY SINGLE attempt.
  25. Despite the inability to cancel my room, I had to accept the room provided by the voucher from the airline because I could not obtain transportation to the Red Roof Inn.
  26. It was official: I had been cheated out of $100 by a Big Airline-Big Hotel racket.  We’ll call this the Airline-Hotel Industrial Complex.
  27. I chose not to take my bag back and recheck it the next morning because I had a sneaky feeling I would get charged the $25 checking fee again.  So I went another night without a change of clothes or toiletries.
  28. I stayed overnight near the airport with a 6:15am flight to Detroit the next morning.  I had to awake at 3:15am for this.
  29. The flight to Detroit went fine.
  30. While in Detroit, I had to call my boss and explain the situation to him without sounding like I was trying to skip work due to a hangover from a wild Sunday night.
  31. To put a cherry on top of the sundae of misery, my flight from Detroit to Buffalo was delayed by 45 minutes.
  32. I arrived in Buffalo expecting my bag to not be there because that would have been consistent with the weekend.  Fortunately, my bag was there.
  33. I stepped inside my home at 1:30pm on Monday.  To show my dedication, I decided to go into work for the afternoon.  In a rush, I threw on some decent looking business casual attire, but neglected to comb my frazzled hair or shave.
  34. I walked into work and greeted my supervisor.  Instead of receiving warm sentiments for my Herculean commitment, I was reprimanded for not shaving, not combing my hair, and leaving town without scheduling a vacation.

So is my story with Delta Airlines.  I certainly now know why their flights are always the cheapest available.  I will NEVER fly with the airline again.  I have also rekindled my hatred for large enterprise, which was present during my early high school days as a hard-core leftist.  I was treated like a god-damn cow by those schmucks.  I hope they BURN in Hell.  Also, I am now more motivated than ever to earn enough income to buy my own plane one day.

So, for all those who are flying into Ithaca this August, I can only say one thing:

DO NOT FLY DELTA AIRLINES!  DO NOT FLY DELTA AIRLINES!!  DO NOT FLY DELTA AIRLINES!!!

DO

NOT

FLY

DELTA

AIRLINES!!!!

Posted in Campus Insiders, National News | Tagged: , , | 1 Comment »

Genes Key to Longevity

Posted by Peter Bouris on July 1, 2010

Researchers at Boston University have found that the key to one living longer than 100 years is mainly genetics, not healthy living.  The researchers discovered 150 genetic variants that can predict longevity at 77% accuracy when aggregating their individual influences. While it was found that healthy living can marginally influence one’s lifespan into his or her 80s, genetics begin to play an increasingly important role after this.  For those who live upward to 110 or longer, genetics are almost the sole factors in their longevity.

The researchers will put up a website within the next month where people can obtain a rough estimate of their longevity.  It is also expected that companies selling genetic tests will quickly include the new longevity assessment.

Hopefully this serves to reverse the trend of Americans becoming obsessively health-crazed over the past decade (ironically, obesity figures have grown worse).  A few years ago, water overtook beer as the most popular beverage in America.  This was extremely indicative of a long coming transformation in the nation’s culture from community and friends (beer) to individualism and narcissism (water).  If folks start to believe that their longevity is more linked to nature than their activities, perhaps we will see a renaissance in Americans preferring the company of others instead of that of their own vanity.

Posted in National News | 1 Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.