Cornell Insider

Stay Informed. Demand truth. Be an Insider. – A blog by the writers of the Cornell Review

Posts Tagged ‘IFC’

How Will Greeks Respond to the University Suspending TEP?

Posted by Alfonse Muglia on November 13, 2012

After allegations of hazing against Tau Epsilon Phi (TEP) reached the press this morning, the Interfraternity Council is calling for all fraternities to increase accountability in these closing weeks of the semester. These student leaders should also be putting pressure on the University to better define its policy and to define the consequences for when this policy is broken.

IFC leaders and Dean Travis Apgar held an emergency meeting with all chapter presidents on Monday night. In the closed-door meeting, student leaders challenged chapters to improve behavior and remove externalities, before the University is compelled to take action, as it did with the TEP situation. This action could be serious, as rumors are circulating of threats by the University to potentially shorten or to make other alterations to Rush Week in January. Nevertheless, the individual chapters are still getting the opportunity to overcome the majority of obstacles themselves. For now, the ball remains in the court of the students.

This autonomy, however, comes under the watchful, ambiguous eye of the Office of Fraternity and Sorority Affairs. On Monday, students learned how quickly their autonomy can be taken away. The decision to suspend TEP did not come from the IFC, but rather it came from the University, bypassing the IFC’s judicial process. Reports are that TEP was in the midst of an IFC investigation at the time of the University’s announcement.

Furthermore, and perhaps even more interesting, is the fact that the TEP brothers’ decision to call 9-1-1 will not be protected under medical amnesty. This policy of medical amnesty apparently only protects chapters in the IFC’s Court of Law (the IFC Judicial Board), and not in the University’s hearing process which TEP now finds itself. If nothing else, students should be calling this University policy (or should I say lack of policy) into question. Why has the University not adopted this important measure that removes barriers for putting student safety above fear of potential reprimanding? Why was this question not raised in this morning’s coverage?

With that aside, Cornell Greeks again find themselves in what seems to be perpetual hot water in the closing weeks of the semester, a time when many houses are holding dinners and other events to gain an edge before January’s rush week. Perhaps more so than ever, it is clear that one house’s misbehavior will not only affect its own chapter’s status, but the status and autonomy of the entire fraternity system.

Posted in Campus Insiders | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

IFC To Create Bro-led ‘Task Force’

Posted by Oliver Renick on February 8, 2011

Incoming Interfraternity Council President Dan Freshman ’12 is hard at work cleaning up the Greek scene. After keeping an eye on Cornell’s frats during their first hard-alcohol-free week of rush, he is now looking to create a committee that will oversee the implementation of last semester’s changes to the Recognition Policy, a.k.a ‘Prohibition Policy.’ Freshman contacted fraternity members on Monday looking for brothers to apply to be a part of his ‘Greek Task Force.’

Members of the task force would meet weekly with IFC executive board members to discuss means of implementation and the interests of the Greek student body.  These ideas would then be presented to chapter presidents and delegates at IFC general body meetings to vote on legislation and put policies into action.  These meetings would be closed discussions that would encourage honesty and realistic expectations for the Greek system.

It’s not apparent whether the Greek Task Force (GTF) will more closely resemble S.W.A.T or Best Buy’s Geek Squad, but the good news is hopefully the head bro of GTF will have a little more insight into the college social scene than Frat-star Hubbell ’67 or renowned C-town socialite Apgar.

Of course, as is with any legit task force, Freshman said the group will be “represent a diverse field of houses and perspectives.”  No word if butt-chugging is a requirement.

Hat tip to JPMITB

Posted in Campus Insiders | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

Cornell Top Stories of 2010 – #3: This is Sparta

Posted by Oliver Renick on December 29, 2010

From vltalvastudios.com

Much to the dismay of fratboys everywhere, Cornell’s Greek system came under attack this August when the administration announced its desire to rework the University’s fraternity system. Associate Dean of Students for Fraternity and Sorority Affairs Travis Apgar lead the Big Fat Greek Crackdown that was met with vehement opposition by Cornellians. Animosity brewed and students protested that Cornell officials were out of touch with students’ social life.

On August 25, The Daily Sun ran the first article detailing the possible restructuring of the Greek system. The change that received the most attention was the claim that by 2012-2013, freshmen would be barred from attending open frat parties with alcohol. Rushing processes would be without alcohol, and frat-sorority mixers would be eliminated during the pledging process. Dennis gave some analysis on the announcement, highlighting points that would be echoed throughout the debate that would ensue over the following months.

The demand for weekend boozing is not going anywhere, but once freshman are barred from attending open frat parties, there’s going to be a big discrepancy between supply and demand. Think about it: on a given night early in the semester, 500-1000 freshmen (maybe more) will now be looking for a new outlet for boozing. Where will they all go?…

…There are a couple of possible sources of supply: dorm rooms, Collegetown, the woods behind Jessup? Collegetown seems like the most likely destination for the freshmen swarms, but this presents a new problem

Freshman looking for alcohol in less safe locations proved to be the most common argument against the new policies. When the IFC hosted a forum on August 8th with University officials, fraternity representatives repeatedly tried to convince Apgar, VP Susan Murphy ’73, and Dean of Students Kent Hubbel ’67 that they were putting students in danger. With IFC President Allen Miller ’11 leading the discussion, things got heated pretty fast. Frat bros lined up out the doors in a packed Uris basement auditorium to air their grievances with the panel. Boos and hisses flew, and it was generally kinda embarrassing from an outsider’s perspective. But Hubbel, disgraced Alpha Delt alumnus, and his team held firm.

The University is “faced with a set of rising expectations with regard to abuse of alcohol on campus, and we are obligated to do something.  We’re not here to advocate for a dry campus or a dry Greek system,” he said. Then gave advised the fraternities that “if you want to see success of the Greek system, you should join with us.”

Later that night, President Vince Andrews ’11 – Phi Gamma Delta member – and his Student Assembly wrote a letter to Dean Hubbel expressing their anger over the University’s lack of communication with student government about the decision.

All of the forums and gripes proved to be in vain. The Board of Trustees reviewed the proposed policies on October 28th and approved. In yet another exhibition of futility, students’ voices and the Student Assembly were overrun by administrative power. Ripples from the conflict reached other Ivy League schools, where students braced for the possibility of the same policies being enacted at their Universities. In September Harvard students called Cornell admins dangerous, and Princeton admins hinted at a copy-cat policy.

As we said then, hopefully they’ll wait until 2012 to see the effects of 2010′s epic Prohibition Policy.

Posted in Campus Insiders | Tagged: , , , , | 1 Comment »

SA ‘Troubled’ by Administration’s ‘Lack of Consultation’ Over Prohibition Policy

Posted by Oliver Renick on September 8, 2010

In a letter today to Dean of Students Kent Hubbell, the Student Assembly expressed their discomfort with the manner in which the administration has gone about pursuing revisions to the University Recognition Policy for Greek chapters.

“We are troubled by the administration’s lack of consultation with student governance and relevant stakeholders,” said SA leaders, who believe there should be greater student involvement and dialogue before action is taken.  While Cornell’s admins have met with IFC leaders on the subject, there has yet to be any extensive involvement with the student body at large.

“We aim to offer a comprehensive, multi-faceted perspective on this issue by incorporating the opinions of students not represented by the Greek governing bodies into the discussion as these changes may come to affect the broader student experience. Because the Student Assembly was not consulted, undergraduate participation has been limited in a decision that may ultimately affect anyone,” the letter said.

Hubbell responded by saying “it seemed reasonable to us to begin the discussion with the students and alumni of Cornell’s Greek system.  We look forward to having the SA begin their work, and will facilitate the process as we go forward.”

The letter to Hubbell, along with the SA’s plan for approaching the prohibition policy, will be discussed in tomorrow’s assembly meeting in Willard Straight at 4:45 pm.

Posted in Campus Insiders | Tagged: , , , , | 1 Comment »

Don’t Haze Me, Bro!

Posted by Oliver Renick on September 8, 2010

In a plaid-laden auditorium, University admins are met with interrogation, hisses, boos, bros, and even a Keystone reference as Greek members battle new Prohibition Policy.

From vltalvastudios.com

In response to the University’s recent crackdown on Greek social life, Cornell fraternity members held a forum this evening to voice their concerns against the campus-wide movement to minimize alcohol abuse.  With a single unanimous mission, a Greek Phalanx of speakers soon assembled against Cornell administrators Travis Apgar, Dean Kent Hubbel ’67 and Susan Murphy ’73.

The scene in Uris G01 was certainly a fratty one, with the entire auditorium filled by Greek members and lines of angry bros waiting behind police for seats to become available.  What gavel-tapping IFC President Allen Miller ’11 planned as a calm, collected meeting quickly morphed into a mild hazing of the three administrators and what was labeled as their ill-conceived plan.

The proposal, spearheaded by Apgar, is designed to “amend [fraternity] recognition policies in a few simple ways,” by requiring alcohol-free rushing and pledging, as well as disallowing freshman from attending fraternity parties involving alcohol.  Each objective is planned in such a way as to slowly wean the frats off of alcohol, and all changes will be fully implemented by Spring 2012.  However, Apgar made it clear that the University doesn’t want to “control [the Greek system],” and that they “still need to work out details.”

While fraternity speakers were complemented with vehement applause and finger-snapping, the sometimes roundabout responses from Cornell’s administrators were often met with grumbling and hissing.  The group of disgruntled Cornellians became especially lively when Dean of Students Kent Hubbell prefaced a circumventing answer by reminding the crowd of his membership in the Alpha Delta Phi fraternity.

A red-faced Hubbell laughed off the hisses and boos, and went on to remind the students that this is a “national problem,” and that the University is “faced with a set of rising expectations with regard to abuse of alcohol on campus, and we are obligated to do something.  We’re not here to advocate for a dry campus or a dry Greek system.”  In a stern voice, he advised fraternities that “if you want to see success of the Greek system, you should join with us.”

Regardless of the administrators’ claims, IFC members continued to demand explanations for how the number of Greek recruits would be maintained, how safety would be improved, and why fraternities were being targeted in the first place.  One student asked why co-ops were ignored, claiming “an attack on the Greek system,” while Ryan Lett ’12, president of Phi Gamma Delta ‘Fiji’ asked if the university was merely trying “to move liability away from Cornell.”

Alpha Sigma Phi’s Doug Durant ’11 said that drinking “was not a keystone part of my recruitment.  I see an affront on Greek traditions.  I can see no other result from this besides shrinking of the Greek system.”

Murphy attempted to reassure fraternity presidents, saying “This will not result in a shrinking of the system.  It’s not up to me to decide your social life on a Friday or Saturday night.  All we’re doing is changing policy – not practices or habits. I take issue with the claim that frats provide the only safe place to drink.”

Although the initiative aims to maximize safety, spokesmen from the fraternities echoed sentiments that abolition of recruitment boozing would lead to more dangerous drinking environments in dorms and in Collegetown.  Rohan Siddhanti ’12, president of Sigma Pi, bluntly told the panel “fraternities and sororities will adapt.  We will find ways to take these kids.  To Collegetown, to Turningstone… they’ll be drinking in their dorms.  It’s not changing the culture – it’s not changing the roots.”

While Murphy quickly reminded Siddhanti of his own chapter’s rocky past, the latter half of the forum was a rather raucous tag-team assault on the amendments proposed to redefine the University Recognition Policy.  At one point forum leader Allen Miller reminded guests to “keep this professional… to a point.”  With the Fraternities’ extensive laundry list of complaints and a single unanimous voice against the new policy, one almost expected an administrator to beg, “don’t haze me, bro!”

Posted in Campus Insiders | Tagged: , , , , | 22 Comments »

And Another One Slips Past ‘Stun’ Editors

Posted by Oliver Renick on January 28, 2010

I’m in an awkward situation here.  I’m often shocked when I read the Daily Stun, but I’m not sure why I keep writing about the absurdities that often grace the pages of our school’s flagship paper.  At this point, they have become so commonplace that I shouldn’t be shocked.  Yet I am.  I know a few editors at the Stun and they seem to be reasonable people.  So the only answer I have is that they just simply don’t do any editing anymore.  And to complicate things even more, the article I’m calling your attention to today was written by one of the few conservatives at our Blue School, and probably the only one at the Stun (other than when the Bellin Tolls and the WackAttack!).  But that’s what happens when you take an apologetic tone and say high GPA’s (2.25s, precisely) are classist and discriminatory.  I hate to create a riff among conservative Cornellians, but here goes – enough disclaimers.

The article by Leigha Kemmett on fraternities creating a GPA requirement is quite ridiculous – I literally cannot find any logical path from which she drew her conclusions.  To use her own words: it’s a “frankly, stupid” argument.  She takes quite a malicious tone and manages to transform a thoughtful, smart decision by the IFC into a conspiratorial one – as if the frats are all gathering in a dark basement, conniving and hatching a plan to keep dumb people out of their special clubs.  Kemmett believes that by frats enacting a minimum GPA requirement of 2.25 for their pledges, they are “exclusionary…elitist…[exhibiting] classism…blackballing rushees,” and ultimately not living up to their responsibility of “provid[ing] an atmosphere where young minds can blossom and expand.”

How soon we venture from reality.  Let’s set the record straight here, cause obviously nobody else wants to.  Men at Cornell do not join a fraternity to enrich their academic atmosphere and allow their mind to blossom.  They join a frat to make good friends, enrich their social atmosphere, meet sorority babes, and allow their minds to shrivel in Keystone Light.  Not that there’s anything wrong with that – many Cornellians feel this is the ultimate college experience.  And sure, I have many friends in frats who I know have helped other brothers frequently with schoolwork and aided other frat members in their academic difficulties – this happens all the time.  But anyone who has ever gone through pledging will tell you it’s not a place for <2.25ers.  Most programs at Cornell will enforce serious repercussions if one is to fall below a 2.0 GPA.  I for one know that retaining student status in over half of the engineering majors requires a GPA >2.2, and none accept a GPA below 2.0, which I believe is the case for most programs at Cornell.

Yet instead of requiring neophyte Cornellians (most pledges join in their first 3 semesters) to demonstrate some stability in their academics, Kemmett would advocate a system that allows new, inexperienced Cornellians to toe the thin line between success and crushing defeat – how exciting! What is most vexing is that Kemmett goes on in the rest of her article to highlight all the arguments one would make against her stance.  Namely, the fact that if you are doing poorly at Cornell, you should seek help from TAs, PROFESSORS, OFFICE HOURS, TUTORS, HELP SESSIONS, REVIEW SESSIONS, CLASSMATES – not from foam parties, binge-drinking, and all-night mixers.  Do not take me wrong – I know many, many brilliant fraternity members.  But when you’re borderline failing your classes, pledging is not the solution.  I can’t believe I have to be the one to point this out.

Either the author is truly confused on this whole subject, or she has some sort of inner turmoil / resentment towards the fraternity system.  Unfortunately, much of her article is quite bitter and self-absorbed, making me lean towards the latter option.  Not only do I disagree with her on every point, but I highly support this fantastic and responsible decision by the IFC.  I’ll let you decide on some of her quotes (my thoughts in bold).

Either the IFC needs to cut the shit about frats being good for students academically, or they need to rescind this rule, to avoid continuing to govern in hypocrisy. [more great quotes like this after the jump]. Why the animosity? Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Campus Insiders | Tagged: , , | 4 Comments »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: