Cornell Insider

a blog by the writers of the Cornell Review

Posts Tagged ‘Krauthammer’

Monday Reading Madness #38

Posted by Cornell Insider Staff on March 1, 2010

Only how many more weeks until spring?

- In one of the shortest news articles I’ve read in my life, WENY-TV News reports that the Cascadilla Gorge Trail should re-open shortly.

- Cornell researchers help Colorado crack down on handicapped parking violations. Are the same researchers responsible for my recent ticket on North Campus?

- Cornell Basketball continues to roll to an Ivy Championship, and we’re predicted to be a #11 seed in this bracketology installment. The men’s hockey team also had a productive weekend, earning a first round bye for the ECAC Tournament.

- Speaking of hockey, congratulations to Cornell student Rebecca Johnston on her Olympic gold medal.

- “Hide the cookie jars” say Cornell researchers.

- According to another Cornell researcher, people work harder against underdogs to save face.

- VC Blogger Ilya Somin disagrees with an article that argues that intelligent people are more likely to be liberal.

- Is Mitch Daniels on the 2012 short list?

- Thomas Sowell discusses the dangers of the aimless apology.

- Finally, another great Krauthammer column on Toyota and the price of modernity.

Posted in Campus Insiders, National News | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Monday Reading Madness #36

Posted by Cornell Insider Staff on February 14, 2010

- A disappointing weekend for Cornell sports, with both hockey and basketball going 1-1.

Still #1 in Ivy Basketball.

- Elie has a cool illustrated post on Cornell Law School selectivity.

- The “New Budget Model” via METAezra.

- Did anyone run into ‘Deadheads’ over the weekend?

- Cornell women’s ice hockey standout Rebecca Johnston had three assists in Canada’s 18-0 rout of Slovakia at the Vancouver Olympics.

- A Cornell senior wins a Churchill Scholarship.

- Maybe I’m just not that good at game theory, but this does not seem like a dominance solvable game.

- More on drinking psychology.

- The Economist leader discusses the new threats to the global economy.

- GMU Law Professor Ilya Somin has an interesting op-ed on political ignorance.

- Krauthammer discusses Russia’s approaching monopoly on rides into space.

Posted in Campus Insiders, National News | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Hollow Words on Terrorism

Posted by Oliver Renick on January 2, 2010

Yet again this week, the (Kraut)hammer struck down on the Obama administration with more unforgiving castigation.  He discusses the attempted Christmas day bombing attempt as no one else can – if there is one article you need to read on this subject, it’s his.  What I think is so important about Krauthammer’s article is that he does not focus on the blame game or the intricacies of how this passenger managed to get as far as he did (although all important discussions).  Instead he focuses on the most telling part of this whole story: Obama’s reaction to the event and his persistence in denying a war on terror.

Obama may have declared the war over. Unfortunately al-Qaeda has not. Which gives new meaning to the term “asymmetric warfare.”

And produces linguistic — and logical — oddities that littered Obama’s public pronouncements following the Christmas Day attack. In his first statement, Obama referred to Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab as “an isolated extremist.” This is the same president who, after the Ford Hood shooting, warned us “against jumping to conclusions” — code for daring to associate Nidal Hasan’s mass murder with his Islamist ideology. Yet, with Abdulmutallab, Obama jumped immediately to the conclusion, against all existing evidence, that the bomber acted alone.

Obama reassured the nation that this “suspect” had been charged. Reassurance? The president should be saying: We have captured an enemy combatant — an illegal combatant under the laws of war: no uniform, direct attack on civilians — and now to prevent future attacks, he is being interrogated regarding information he may have about al-Qaeda in Yemen.

Instead, Abdulmutallab is dispatched to some Detroit-area jail and immediately lawyered up. At which point — surprise! — he stops talking.

Posted in National News | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

MRM #24

Posted by Cornell Insider Staff on November 8, 2009

Basu

from Cornell.edu

- Krauthammer: “The Myth of ’08, Demolished.”

- Economics Chair Basu will be leaving to serve as one of India’s top economic advisors.

- Roundup: bloggers meet with the Treasury.

- The S.A. voted to reinstate Ken Glover.

- From MR, a good post on how competitive college have recently become more competitive.

- A new national park will be created at the crash sight of flight 93.

- It’s only a matter of time until Obama decides to tackle education.

- Friday afternoon provided some of the most ridiculous news to hit Cornell recently – an absurdly dirty private conversation gone public in the Johnson school.

Posted in Campus Insiders, National News | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

(Kraut)Hammering the Nail in the White House’s Coffin

Posted by Oliver Renick on October 23, 2009

On Wednesday, Dennis wrote about Nile Gardner’s article on the war between Fox News and the White House.

From postwritersgroup.com

From postwritersgroup.com

There’s no doubt about it – a battle has been waged and the Capitol Hill generals are of the likes of Rahm Emmanuel, Anita Dunn, and David Axelrod.  Today, Charles Krauthammer (a.k.a ‘the Hammer’ at the Insider) takes on the subject, and as usual, explores and exposes every nuance of the most recent leftist media attack.

Earlier this week, the man in charge of overseeing the executive payrolls at organizations receiving stimulus money, Ken Feinberg, was offered up by the Treasury Department to interview on just about every news network except Fox.  Fortunately, the other news channels refused such an offer without the inclusion of the White House’s step-child network, Fox.  Krauthammer points out the important relevance of a seemingly trivial action:

This was an important defeat because there’s a principle at stake here. While government can and should debate and criticize opposition voices, the current White House goes beyond that. It wants to delegitimize any significant dissent. The objective is no secret. White House aides openly told Politico that they’re engaged in a deliberate campaign to marginalize and ostracize recalcitrants, from Fox to health insurers to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

He goes on to point out that such actions taken by the White House do not violate any laws or constitutional guidelines, but rather an intangible political principle that must be held up.

There’s nothing illegal about such search-and-destroy tactics. Nor unconstitutional. But our politics are defined not just by limits of legality or constitutionality. We have norms, Madisonian norms.

Madison argued that the safety of a great republic, its defense against tyranny, requires the contest between factions or interests. His insight was to understand “the greater security afforded by a greater variety of parties.” They would help guarantee liberty by checking and balancing and restraining each other — and an otherwise imperious government.

Factions should compete, but also recognize the legitimacy of other factions and, indeed, their necessity for a vigorous self-regulating democracy. Seeking to deliberately undermine, delegitimize and destroy is not Madisonian. It is Nixonian.

What Dennis said in his last post is absolutely true, and the Hammer reaffirms this in his article – there is absolutely no doubt that the White House will lose this battle.  The more effort the administration puts in to delegitimizing Fox News, the more they empower it.  My question is: who is in charge of this assault?  For a president that was hailed as being so incredibly smart and politically agile, this is by far one of the worst possible moves the White House could make, and Obama has not made a visible effort to end it.

Posted in National News | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

The Choice of American Decline

Posted by Cornell Insider Staff on October 10, 2009

Is America in decline? Has America reached the limits of its influence as a global superpower, and will we see a further dilution of America’s power in the coming years? In light of the global financial crisis and the election of President Obama, (as well as more recent events like the abandonment of missile shields in Europe, the growing influence of the G-20, and falling confidence in the dollar), America’s status as a global superpower has come under more scrutiny.

These days, the popular and prevailing ideas are that America is not an indispensable superpower and that “multipolarity” is good for international politics. There are some dissenters like Josef Joffe, as well as me and my Georgetown colleague (sorry for the shameless self-plug), but we are a minority.

In his most recent article for the Weekly Standard, Charles Krauthammer disagrees with both camps, saying that there is no such thing as an inevitable trajectory for America’s future in international politics. Here’s a short excerpt that highlights his main argument:

Among these crosscurrents, my thesis is simple: The question of whether America is in decline cannot be answered yes or no. There is no yes or no. Both answers are wrong, because the assumption that somehow there exists some predetermined inevitable trajectory, the result of uncontrollable external forces, is wrong. Nothing is inevitable. Nothing is written. For America today, decline is not a condition. Decline is a choice. Two decades into the unipolar world that came about with the fall of the Soviet Union, America is in the position of deciding whether to abdicate or retain its dominance. Decline–or continued ascendancy–is in our hands.

The rest of the article is a great analysis and assessment of  Obama’s foreign policy and how it is directly affecting America’s standing in the world. In my opinion, this is one of Krauthammer’s best articles of late, and that’s saying a lot. Highly recommended.

Posted in National News | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Monday Reading Madness #12

Posted by Oliver Renick on August 17, 2009

- For hockey fans: Bilmes beat me to the report, but it appears that Riley Nash will be sticking around for this upcoming season.

- “IvyGate Science Theatre 3000” on Princeton Review College Lists 2010. Ivies are bolded for convenience. Read the whole thing.

- Shifting the puck away from hockey for once, here’s a very interesting article examining the correlation between ex-NFL men and republicanism.

- The legalization debate sees an interesting perspective in an article written by two law enforcement veterans, where violence and safety of cops is the main subject.

- George Will writes on card games? Interesting.

- Another week and another health care audible called by the White House means another article by the HAMMER!

- Recently, Dennis wrote in thedcwriteup.com about space travel. So did Krauthammer. Here’s a summation of both sides of the argument and an analysis in Economist.

- Not for the first time, the Review appears online at FIRE.com (Foundation for Individual Rights in Education) in a Cornellian’s article about our school’s tendency to censorship. (hat tip to Ryan Lett)

Posted in Campus Insiders | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

MRM # 11

Posted by Cornell Insider Staff on August 10, 2009

- The zamboni driver at Lynah will in fact be retiring.

- The new Forbes “America’s Best Colleges 2009″ does not deserve its own post and/or analysis. Cornell came in 205th, with ECAC rivals Union (26) and Colgate (29) coming in hundreds of places ahead of Big Red. I know you guys are trying to be different than U.S. News, but c’mon!!

dubai_skyline_picture3

Dubai Skyline...as glamorous as it seems?

- No MRM is complete without Krauthammer’s most recent health care reform proposal.

- A disturbing, yet darkly funny article about a Paraguayan child who turned about to be alive at a wake after being declared dead. Look out for the DailyMail’s informative graphic of Paraguay’s confusing location.

- Another week and George Will continues his assault on the global warming hysteria.

- I’m not a big Twitter fan, but the most recent application of the technology is particularly interesting – John Quincy Adams’ diaries are now being posted online in a pseudo-time-travel blog. After a book, a movie, and now Twitter, seems as if the Adams are the most high-tech founding fathers thus far.

- A must-read article about the shady business police investigation work in Dubai that is targeting and accusing foreign investors and entrepreneurs to take the fall for a sliding economy. The harsh investigation procedures led a frightened ex-French-intelligence businessman to utilize his old skills and escape the country via a complicated underwater scheme.

Posted in Campus Insiders, National News | Tagged: , , | 3 Comments »

Krauthammer on Ricci

Posted by Cornell Insider Staff on July 3, 2009

Check out this great article by Charles Krauthammer on the implications of the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Ricci v. DeStefano case (also known as the New Haven Firefighters case). Here’s an excerpt: 

The Supreme Court’s ruling on the Ricci case — that white firemen suffered illegal discrimination when a promotional test on which they did well was thrown out because not enough blacks did well — will have no effect on Sonia Sotomayor’s nomination to the Supreme Court. While overturned on Ricci, she is protected by the four dissenting justices who upheld the side of the case she had taken as a Circuit Court judge. Sotomayor was additionally helped by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s insistence on reading her dissent from the bench, as if to emphasize the legitimacy of her position — and, by implication, Sotomayor’s.

Ricci left Sotomayor relatively unscathed. But not affirmative action. Ricci raised the bar considerably on overt discrimination against one racial group simply to undo the unintentionally racially skewed results of otherwise fair and objective employment procedures (in this case, examinations).

Posted in National News | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

Sotomayor revisited by the (Kraut)Hammer

Posted by Oliver Renick on May 29, 2009

It’s been two days since Dennis’s post on SCOTUS Judge nominee Sotomayor, and today’s Washington Post featured its weekly editorial by Charles Krauthammer, who unveiled his advice for the conservative reaction to the nominee.  Krauthammer says: (I will include lots of quotes because an account is required to read the article at the website)

What should a principled conservative do? Use the upcoming hearings not to deny her the seat, but to illuminate her views. No magazine gossip from anonymous court clerks. No "temperament" insinuations. Nothing ad hominem. The argument should be elevated, respectful and entirely about judicial philosophy.

Krauthammer’s article focuses on one of Sotomayor’s past rulings, that upheld the decision made by the New Haven Fire Department to dismiss 20 men’s promotions based on the grounds that none of the black applicants passed a required test to achieve those promotions.  Krauthammer goes on to talk about the problems surrounding Sotomayor’s tendency to be empathetic in rulings, and her obvious ‘identity politics,’ an issue I slightly brushed upon in the comments section of Dennis’s last post.

…and on her statements about the inherent differences between groups, and the superior wisdom she believes her Latina physiology, culture and background grant her over a white male judge. They perfectly reflect the Democrats’ enthrallment with identity politics, which assigns free citizens to ethnic and racial groups possessing a hierarchy of wisdom and entitled to a hierarchy of claims upon society.

Sotomayor shares President Obama’s vision of empathy as lying at the heart of judicial decision-making — sympathetic concern for litigants’ background and current circumstances, and for how any judicial decision would affect their lives.

. . .

But all that stops at the courthouse door. Figuratively and literally, justice wears a blindfold. It cannot be a respecter of persons. Everyone must stand equally before the law, black or white, rich or poor, advantaged or not.

His basic conclusion is the same assumed by Dennis in the Insider’s last post: that, as George Costanza might say, ‘barring some unforeseen incident,’ Sotomayor will indeed be confirmed.  One of Krauthammer’s other resounding points in the article takes this a step further, saying that she should be confirmed, only because it is an American’s responsibility to give deference to a President’s nominee, saying that “elections have consequences.”

Vote Democratic and you get mainstream liberalism: a judicially mandated racial spoils system and a jurisprudence of empathy that hinges on which litigant is less "advantaged."

Posted in National News | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.